[NPInfo] that PMR pt

[Priscilla Merrill]

Thanks, very helpful, my little PET!  I challenge you to a game of "kick the
scan".  Sorry, Christine!  LOL.

Priscilla

-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of Dena
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 8:57 AM
To: 'NP Info'
Subject: RE: [NPInfo] that PMR pt

I believe the difference is that PET scans show chemical and metabolic
activity so, whereas a bone scan can spot a lesion that indicates the bone
is breaking down (or repairing itself), a Pet scan can tell if the lesion is
living/breathing/eating and differentiate between active and non-active
disease. By simply showing metabolic activity, Pet scans can pick up cancers
way before x-rays, CTs, and MRIs can pick up anatomical changes. Pet scans
can also see mets in the bone marrow that bone scans can't. I imagine the
cost of a Pet scan is a lot more than a bone scan so it would make sense to
do a bone scan first and if you see something suspicious, then see of it's
alive and eating... so you can get to work on killing it. 
Dena Galler

-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of Priscilla Merrill
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 3:50 AM
To: 'NP Info'
Subject: RE: [NPInfo] that PMR pt

That link was great Dena.
Question:  they say to order a bone scan as follow up but I thought it was
PET scan.  I admit to not fully understanding the difference.  Can anyone
out there explain to me how these are different?

Thanks  Priscilla

-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of Dena
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 12:39 AM
To: 'NP Info'
Subject: RE: [NPInfo] that PMR pt

Paula--
You wrote "he had prostate ca several years ago and surgey. what is weird i
that he had spine films and chest films-NEGATIVE except his compression
fracture last spring". 

I'm simply trying to point out to you that the compression fx MAY NOT have
been a NEGATIVE finding as you stated-- it could in fact have been a VERY
POSITIVE finding and, with this man's prostate cancer history, someone (his
care provider at the time) should have gotten suspicious and picked up on it
when they read the x-ray report. Sounds like someone (his care provider at
the time) dropped the ball. In patients with breast, lung, or prostate
cancer (as well as thyroid and kidney), a fracture MAY indicate a metastatic
process going on and one should not just dismiss it as a NEGATIVE finding
(as you have mentioned several times) without a full work-up. In this poor
man's case, the compression fx may have been an extremely significant
finding-- nothing NEGATIVE about it at all-- but apparently, according to
your report, no one was putting 2+2 together and now everyone is acting so
surprised at the results. It probably should have been one of the first
things someone thought of at the time of the x-ray. 
Dena Galler


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1106 - Release Date: 11/2/2007
9:46 PM
 

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1106 - Release Date: 11/2/2007
9:46 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1106 - Release Date: 11/2/2007
9:46 PM