[NPInfo] RE: NPInfo Digest, Vol 25, Issue 31

Anne Chamberlain aec417 at comcast.net
Sun Apr 6 22:28:15 PDT 2008


I've been reading the DNP thread with curiosity.  I have another question
regarding the DNP to throw in the pot. So, does one have to get the degree
in their state of licensure or can one do it partially via the web with
local clinicals, etc. (if clinicals are required)?  Is there a way to not
have to re-locate if there isn't a program near you?  Since states vary so
much on levels of NP training, how is this accounted for?  It seems to me
that since it's not required for licensure and practice, the rules in how
you earn the degree (and later apply it) should also be more flexible.  What
do those of you in the know say?  I have no intention of going back to
school AGAIN, if I don't have to.  I already have twelve years of college
and quit that "career" a few years ago.  Except for the first two years, my
schooling is all directly in nursing. If I had gone the medical school
route, I WOULD have been done much sooner, but I LOVE nursing.  Almost
couldn't help myself.  It's now time to live life instead of reading about
theories, etc..  I learn new stuff almost every day still, in daily
practice, but enough is enough (school)!  I get how the others are done. At
some point we want to just be working and enjoying our families and friends
like 'regular' people.  


-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of npinfo-request at nurse.net
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 8:02 PM
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Subject: NPInfo Digest, Vol 25, Issue 31


Send NPInfo mailing list submissions to
	npinfo at nurse.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	npinfo-request at nurse.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	npinfo-owner at nurse.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of NPInfo digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: home visit question (Carla Anderson)
   2. Re: CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES (np at c-zone.net)
   3. home care NPs (Rose Moran-Kelly)
   4. Re: CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES (mfnp at cox.net)
   5. RE: DNP Program - University of Tennessee (Dena)
   6. "...line that has been drawn,	but it's not between the NPs &
      Physicians" (Nbalkon at aol.com)
   7. Re: "...line that has been drawn, but it's not between the
      NPs & Physicians"-Yes it Is! (mfnp at cox.net)
   8. Re: "...line that has been drawn,	but it's not between the
      NPs & Phy... (EPartinFNP at aol.com)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carla Anderson <carla_rayne at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] home visit question
To: NP Info <npinfo at nurse.net>
Message-ID: <84193.71310.qm at web50010.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi,
   
  New patients: 99341 15-20min Estab: 99347
                       99342 25-30min           99348
                       99343 40-45                99349
                       99344 60min               99350
  With Medicare you need to state that patient is unable to travel due to
illness or transportation.  Each of the other insurance companies may have
different requirements. 
  Hope that helps, Carla/Oregon

tabbytomey at aol.com wrote:
  Apologies for adding on to a previous topic--I'm not sure how to start a
new one. 
I'm trying to find the codes?& requirements for making home visits. Could
those who are already making them please respond? Thanks for your help.

Susan Tomey, ACNP-BC
Trinity Family Medicine
Meridian, ID 
















-----Original Message-----
From: Dena 
To: 'NP Info' 
Sent: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 1:55 pm
Subject: RE: [NPInfo] DNP Program - University of Tennessee



I researched the UT program and thought it had an excellent and unusual
curriculum-- certainly different than the majority of DNP bridging programs.

Dena Galler

-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of Amelie Hollier
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 11:50 AM
To: NP Info
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] DNP Program - University of Tennessee

Scott-

I graduated in December, 2007 from UT with the DNP in the family 
track. I'm happy to speak with you. My program had 4 clinical 
semesters, very valuable to me----- and also very different than the 
DNP programs people on the list are talking about that had no clinical.

Feel free to email me.

Amelie

amelie at apea.com

Amelie Hollier, DNP, FNP-BC, FAANP
Family Nurse Practitioner
President, APEA
www.apea.com
aahollier at apea.com
800-899-4502




On Apr 6, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Scott wrote:

> Anyone having any knowledge of the University of Tennessee's DNP
> program
> please contact me I have a few quick questions.
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
>
>
> Scott W. Governo MSN, FNP/PNP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NPInfo mailing list
> NPInfo at nurse.net http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
> *****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************



Carla R. Anderson, FNP-C
  Healing Presence Family Practice, PC  
  carla_rayne at yahoo.com
  503 819 9726


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:02:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: np at c-zone.net
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
To: "NP Info" <npinfo at nurse.net>
Message-ID: <1207522963.v2.fusewebmail-272674 at f>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8

With the proliferation of these DNP & similar programs there will be, after
a few years, NO choice at all- it will become a done deal & NPs as now exist
will cease to exist as a practical matter. Doctors fear their erosion of
power & have been fighting to retain turf and revenue sources for many
years. It is going to only get worse. Academics who colloborate with the
medical establishment/political power base only make this worse, and are
contributing to the demise of the NP concept as a viable practice model. It
is too bad that there is no equivalent of the National Rifle Association for
NPs to fight degree inflation, national certification, etc. they way the NRA
fights gun control!  The NRA does not 'go along to get along', it draws a
line, fanatically hangs tough on its core values, and actively fights anyone
who does not support their positions.


----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
Date: Sun, April 6, 2008 13:40
From: Nbalkon at aol.com

>
> In a message dated 4/6/2008 11:11:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> Margienp at aol.com writes:
>
> Amen  also!
> NP for 20 years. I have no intention of that torture  again.
>
>
>
>
>
> NANCE WRITES:  You need not be tortured again... Only by  choice!   :-)
>
> Nancy Balkon, PhD, ANP-C, APRN-CS, NPP
> Southern New York State  Representative -- AANP
> Clinical Associate Professor, Stony Brook University  School of 
> Nursing
>
>
>
> **************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
>   
>
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
> _______________________________________________
> NPInfo mailing list
> NPInfo at nurse.net
> http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
> *****************************
>
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:51:55 -0400
From: "Rose Moran-Kelly" <rosemorankelly at gmail.com>
Subject: [NPInfo] home care NPs
To: "NP Info" <npinfo at nurse.net>, "NP Clinical"
	<np-clinical at nurse.net>
Message-ID:
	<402635820804061651s752c32cfpfac183b6bbadd585 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,  Do we have any NPs who work for home care on list?
Rose


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:14:21 -0700
From: mfnp at cox.net
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Message-ID: <47F9756D.2050108 at cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

There is a line that has been drawn, but it is not between the NPs and 
Physicians, it is between the NPs that only do clinical,and the "Ivory 
Tower" crowd. The fight is becoming more prominent and the gap seems to 
be widening and there is no communication between those that support and 
those that do not. NPs, it appears, as a whole, that are not in favor of 
these new guidelines and were not addressed as either individuals or a 
group, are going to get stuck with guidelines, tests, etc., that once in 
place will not be reversed.

Maybe, this will also be used to divide the NP field into levels of 
those that have the DNP, and those that have been practicing and are not 
going to spend the money to go back to school, and take another board 
exam. It is being shoved down our throats, and those of us that did not 
know about this, will eventually have to meet these new guidelines, or 
leave the profession. Like I have said many times, lets just thank the 
few that are making policy for the many. I have not heard, but do we 
have to bow or curtsy to these new "leaders", or do we go back to the 
days when nurses gave up their seats when a "doctor" was present? Marty

np at c-zone.net wrote:
> With the proliferation of these DNP & similar programs there will be, 
> after a few years, NO choice at all- it will become a done deal & NPs 
> as now exist will cease to exist as a practical matter. Doctors fear 
> their erosion of power & have been fighting to retain turf and revenue 
> sources for many years. It is going to only get worse. Academics who 
> colloborate with the medical establishment/political power base only 
> make this worse, and are contributing to the demise of the NP concept 
> as a viable practice model. It is too bad that there is no equivalent 
> of the National Rifle Association for NPs to fight degree inflation, 
> national certification, etc. they way the NRA fights gun control!  The 
> NRA does not 'go along to get along', it draws a line, fanatically 
> hangs tough on its core values, and actively fights anyone who does 
> not support their positions.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
> Date: Sun, April 6, 2008 13:40
> From: Nbalkon at aol.com
>
>> In a message dated 4/6/2008 11:11:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
>> Margienp at aol.com writes:
>>
>> Amen  also!
>> NP for 20 years. I have no intention of that torture  again.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> NANCE WRITES:  You need not be tortured again... Only by  choice!   :-)
>>
>> Nancy Balkon, PhD, ANP-C, APRN-CS, NPP
>> Southern New York State  Representative -- AANP
>> Clinical Associate Professor, Stony Brook University  School of 
>> Nursing
>>
>>
>>
>> **************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel
Guides.
>>   
>>
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
>> _______________________________________________
>> NPInfo mailing list
>> NPInfo at nurse.net
>> http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
>> *****************************
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NPInfo mailing list
> NPInfo at nurse.net http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
> *****************************
>



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:31:30 -0700
From: "Dena" <galdena at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: RE: [NPInfo] DNP Program - University of Tennessee
To: "'NP Info'" <npinfo at nurse.net>
Message-ID: <005301c8984f$1c1ab5d0$e68ab545 at Dena>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Gaylene--
Now, let's think about this for a minute... do you really think that a
community college would be offering a doctorate program? I kind of doubt it.
Dena Galler

-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of GAAdams at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 2:38 PM
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] DNP Program - University of Tennessee

Amelie  What program in UT?  University of UT or another  program-- I just 
received a flyer for a program out of I think a Communty  college Gaylene
 
 
In a message dated 4/6/2008 12:55:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
galdena at sbcglobal.net writes:

I  researched the UT program and thought it had an excellent and  unusual
curriculum-- certainly different than the majority of DNP bridging programs.

Dena Galler

-----Original Message-----
From:  npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of  Amelie Hollier
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 11:50 AM
To: NP  Info
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] DNP Program - University of  Tennessee

Scott-

I graduated in December, 2007 from UT with the  DNP in the family  
track.  I'm happy to speak with you. My  program had 4 clinical  
semesters, very valuable to me----- and also  very different than the  
DNP programs people on the list are talking  about that had no clinical.

Feel free to email  me.

Amelie

amelie at apea.com

Amelie Hollier, DNP, FNP-BC,  FAANP
Family Nurse Practitioner
President,  APEA
www.apea.com
aahollier at apea.com
800-899-4502




On  Apr 6, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Scott wrote:

> Anyone having any knowledge  of the University of Tennessee's DNP
> program
> please  contact me I have a few quick questions.
>
>
>
> Thank  you in advance,
>
>
>
> Scott W. Governo MSN,  FNP/PNP
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> NPInfo mailing  list
> NPInfo at nurse.net
>  http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
>  *****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo  mailing  list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************

_______________________________________________
NPInfo  mailing  list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************





**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.

 
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:34:05 EDT
From: Nbalkon at aol.com
Subject: [NPInfo] "...line that has been drawn,	but it's not between
	the NPs & Physicians"
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Message-ID: <c18.30cb62ec.352ad40d at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

 
 
In a message dated 4/6/2008 9:15:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mfnp at cox.net  
writes:

There is  a line that has been drawn, but it is not between the NPs and 
Physicians,  it is between the NPs that only do clinical,and the "Ivory 
Tower" crowd.  The fight is becoming more prominent and the gap seems to 
be widening and  there is no communication between those that support and 
those that do  not. NPs, it appears, as a whole, that are not in favor of 
these new  guidelines and were not addressed as either individuals or a 
group, are  going to get stuck with guidelines, tests, etc., that once in 
place will  not be reversed.



NANCE RESPONDS:
 
As a member of the "ivory tower" crowd and practicing NP [I wouldn't  be 
nationally board certified if not] I agree that a line's being drawn. The
line 
occurs because there IS communication and opportunity to comment, be heard,

remain informed.... however... there are NPs who choose not to partake of
the  
opportunity in forums where voices count. Local, state, national
organizations. 
 
 
AANP, for example, offers these opportunities... now proudly has  24,000+  
active voices who remain abreast of NP practice &  education concerns but
also 
participate via PAC.
 
Your comment that follows is a generalization... ie,  "...NPs, it appears,
as 
a whole, that are not in  favor of these new guidelines and were not 
addressed as either individuals or a  group,...".... "I" take exception to
as an NP 
and as a member of the "ivory  tower" .... NOT... as the S. NY Rep. of
AANP... 
 
I've been an NP since '77... Board certified as an ANP since  '79.   Those 
that CAN do.... teach.... and,.. teach full-time too!
 
Nancy Balkon, PhD, ANP-C, APRN-CS, NPP
Southern New  York State Representative -- AANP
Clinical Associate Professor, Stony Brook  University School of  Nursing



**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.

 
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:21:05 -0700
From: mfnp at cox.net
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] "...line that has been drawn, but it's not
	between the	NPs & Physicians"-Yes it Is!
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Message-ID: <47F98511.1090906 at cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Nancy, From the responses you, and I would think many in NY, would be 
better informed than most. But, from the responses, it appears the 
majority of NPs were caught totally unaware. Speaking for myself, I have 
no intention of obtaining another degree, nor do I believe it will make 
me any better or worse, as a practitioner. I also do not want to spend 
the money, nor sit for another exam, especially one that is made to meet 
the level of one aspect of a physician's education. as was stated in the 
article. The second that physicians have input into our education and 
qualifications, only erodes our own profession, and ability to make 
decisions on a nursing level, not in comparison, or competition with 
physicians.

One thing that I have never understood is why these additional exams and 
educational steps are primarily supported by those that are in, or a 
part of, academics, and I would be open if anyone could neutrally 
explain this to me and the group?
Marty


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:02:06 EDT
From: EPartinFNP at aol.com
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] "...line that has been drawn,	but it's not
	between the NPs & Phy...
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Message-ID: <d29.20fd51ee.352ae8ae at aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Marty,
I have been blasted before on this list serv for speaking out  in support of

the DNP, but I will respond again to try to answer your question.  I am not 
part of any academic group, but I do support the move to DNP as entry  to 
practice for ARNPs. I do have a DNP degree, but I took the long route,
starting out 
as a LPN, then ADN, BSN, MSN and finally DNP. At each step along  the way I 
learned. (Although, I only obtained my BSN because I thought it was  going
to 
be required for entry into practice. As an ADN, I thought,  wrongly, I knew
all 
that I needed to know as a nurse.) Besides the  educational value of my 
degree, it has brought me additional respect from other  professionals. In
my 
legislative work, having the title "doctor" lends more  weight to what I
have to 
say. Like it or not, when I use the title, people are  more willing to
listen to 
me. In order to gain full reimbursement for what we do  and to be accepted
as 
a full partner in health care, and not an underling or  someone to be 
supervised, we need to have equal status with other health care  providers.
 
The move to the DNP must not disenfranchise any currently  practicing
masters 
prepared ARNPs. I believe strongly that MSN prepared ARNPs  are excellent 
health care providers.
 
I do not support the CACC exam for DNP graduates. ARNPs do not  need to 
compare themselves to physicians and we do not need to pass a test  written
by/for 
physicians. The measure of quality is not to be like a physician.  The
measure 
of quality for ARNPs is to be the best of nursing and nursing  must
determine 
the measure. The current certification exams written by nursing  
organizations, should stand as the basis for certification whether the
degree is  MSN or 
DNP. This new exam only acts as a divider for our profession. Heaven  knows,

there is enough divisiveness in nursing without throwing up something  else!

 
Beth Partin
 
 
In a message dated 4/6/2008 9:22:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mfnp at cox.net 
writes:

Nancy,  From the responses you, and I would think many in NY, would be 
better  informed than most. But, from the responses, it appears the 
majority of  NPs were caught totally unaware. Speaking for myself, I have 
no intention  of obtaining another degree, nor do I believe it will make 
me any better  or worse, as a practitioner. I also do not want to spend 
the money, nor  sit for another exam, especially one that is made to meet 
the level of one  aspect of a physician's education. as was stated in the 
article. The  second that physicians have input into our education and 
qualifications,  only erodes our own profession, and ability to make 
decisions on a nursing  level, not in comparison, or competition with 
physicians.

One thing  that I have never understood is why these additional exams and 
educational  steps are primarily supported by those that are in, or a 
part of,  academics, and I would be open if anyone could neutrally 
explain this to  me and the  group?
Marty
_______________________________________________
NPInfo  mailing  list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************





**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.

 
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo

End of NPInfo Digest, Vol 25, Issue 31
**************************************




More information about the NPInfo mailing list