[NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
Margienp at aol.com
Margienp at aol.com
Mon Apr 7 05:26:56 PDT 2008
Hello.
Respectfully, I am not being selfish , I did not tell anyone not go obtain a
DNP. I think all of us want the best for the profession.At 52 ,with , this
economy do you really think that I want to be in debt , for 30.000$. It will
not increase my salary.
Please ,just do not "Tell " me., that I MUST obtain my DNP!
I obtained my MSN, 20 years, ago , when few where obtaining their masters.
Margie
In a message dated 4/7/2008 2:11:49 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ewidemark at earthlink.net writes:
When a change like this is made regarding the profession, I think we fail to
look at what it will mean to future generations, and we focus way too much
on how it affects us. I have always believed the DNP to be a good step for
the profession. In doing so we need to think 20 years in the future after I
retire, how will this help those professionals of the next generation. How
will it help us in getting to the 'table' to be more involved in making the
healthcare decisions for the country and less relegated to follow what the
physicians cram down our throats.
I don't think revamping NP education and creating a program that allows us
to advance to a higher educational level is ever going to hurt this
profession. Many had the same gripes when we made minimum level of practice an MSN.
The only difference was that there were much less of us at that time.
I guess I am just tired of hearing the selfish reasons why we shouldn't be
DNPs, and I want to hear more of the selfless reasons why we should be DNPs.
It isn't about us, it is about the next generation. Any transition is
difficult, but once the 4 years DNP programs are graduating new NPs, no one will
think twice about it.
To me the action by the CACC and the Board of Medical Examiners is one last
exasperated attempt to limit the DNPs. But as usual I think that those that
take the test will fly by it, and my hope our next step should be the ability
to apply for residency programs and fellowships along with the other
doctors, thus solidifying ourselves firmly in the healthcare world (I am sure I'll
get some comment on this one!!)
Erich
-----Original Message-----
From: npinfo-bounces at nurse.net [mailto:npinfo-bounces at nurse.net] On Behalf
Of mfnp at cox.net
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 6:14 PM
To: npinfo at nurse.net
Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
There is a line that has been drawn, but it is not between the NPs and
Physicians, it is between the NPs that only do clinical,and the "Ivory
Tower" crowd. The fight is becoming more prominent and the gap seems to
be widening and there is no communication between those that support and
those that do not. NPs, it appears, as a whole, that are not in favor of
these new guidelines and were not addressed as either individuals or a
group, are going to get stuck with guidelines, tests, etc., that once in
place will not be reversed.
Maybe, this will also be used to divide the NP field into levels of
those that have the DNP, and those that have been practicing and are not
going to spend the money to go back to school, and take another board
exam. It is being shoved down our throats, and those of us that did not
know about this, will eventually have to meet these new guidelines, or
leave the profession. Like I have said many times, lets just thank the
few that are making policy for the many. I have not heard, but do we
have to bow or curtsy to these new "leaders", or do we go back to the
days when nurses gave up their seats when a "doctor" was present? Marty
np at c-zone.net wrote:
> With the proliferation of these DNP & similar programs there will be,
> after a few years, NO choice at all- it will become a done deal & NPs as
> now exist will cease to exist as a practical matter. Doctors fear their
> erosion of power & have been fighting to retain turf and revenue sources
> for many years. It is going to only get worse. Academics who colloborate
> with the medical establishment/political power base only make this worse,
> and are contributing to the demise of the NP concept as a viable practice
> model.
> It is too bad that there is no equivalent of the National Rifle
> Association for NPs to fight degree inflation, national certification,
> etc. they way the NRA fights gun control! The NRA does not 'go along to
> get along', it draws a line, fanatically hangs tough on its core values,
> and actively fights anyone who does not support their positions.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Re: [NPInfo] CACC and AACN-READ BETWEEN THE LINES
> Date: Sun, April 6, 2008 13:40
> From: Nbalkon at aol.com
>
>> In a message dated 4/6/2008 11:11:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> Margienp at aol.com writes:
>>
>> Amen also!
>> NP for 20 years. I have no intention of that torture again.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> NANCE WRITES: You need not be tortured again... Only by choice! :-)
>>
>> Nancy Balkon, PhD, ANP-C, APRN-CS, NPP
>> Southern New York State Representative -- AANP
>> Clinical Associate Professor, Stony Brook University School of Nursing
>>
>>
>>
>> **************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel
Guides.
>>
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
>> _______________________________________________
>> NPInfo mailing list
>> NPInfo at nurse.net
>> http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
>> *****************************
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NPInfo mailing list
> NPInfo at nurse.net
> http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
> *****************************
>
_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************
_______________________________________________
NPInfo mailing list
NPInfo at nurse.net
http://lists.nurse.net/mailman/listinfo/npinfo
*****************************
Be kinder than necessary, everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.
**************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
(http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
More information about the NPInfo
mailing list